| 不同前处理方法对石墨炉原子吸收光谱法检测食品中铅含量的影响 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张宏康,王中瑗,黄育杭,邵丹丹,李笑颜,杨启津. 不同前处理方法对石墨炉原子吸收光谱法检测食品中铅含量的影响[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2018, 9(3): 547-551 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张宏康 王中瑗 黄育杭 邵丹丹 李笑颜 杨启津 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 仲恺农业工程学院, 轻工食品学院,国家海洋局南海环境监测中心,仲恺农业工程学院, 轻工食品学院,仲恺农业工程学院, 轻工食品学院,仲恺农业工程学院, 轻工食品学院,仲恺农业工程学院, 轻工食品学院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(41406093)、广东省科技计划项目(2016A02010138)、广东省农业厅国际合作项目(KB1710402)、仲恺农业工程学院大学生创新项目基金(2017A05) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的研究微波消解法、干法消化、湿法消解3种前处理方法对石墨炉原子吸收光谱法检测食品中铅含量的影响。方法以微波消解法为基准,比较其他2种方法的适用性。结果 3种不同前处理方法的检测结果经统计学检验无明显差异,相对标准偏差均小于10%,其中微波消解法的精密度较其他2种方法高,而且加入基体改进剂后回收率及精密度都有了一定的提高。结论 3种不同前处理方法对样品的检测结果没有明显的差异,可以根据实际情况选用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 石墨炉原子吸收分光光度法 前处理 食品 铅 |
| 收稿时间： | 2017-10-13 |
| 修稿时间： | 2018-01-17 |
Effect of pretreatment methods on determination of lead in food by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry |
| |
| ZHANG Hong-Kang,WANG Zhong-Yuan,HUANG Yu-Hang,SHAO Dan-Dan,LI Xiao-Yan and YANG Qi-Jin. Effect of pretreatment methods on determination of lead in food by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2018, 9(3): 547-551 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Hong-Kang WANG Zhong-Yuan HUANG Yu-Hang SHAO Dan-Dan LI Xiao-Yan YANG Qi-Jin |
| |
| Affiliation: | College of Light Industry and Food, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering,South China Sea Environment Monitoring Center,College of Light Industry and Food, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering,College of Light Industry and Food, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering,College of Light Industry and Food, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering and College of Light Industry and Food, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To investigatethe effects of microwave digestion method, dry digestion and wet digestion method on the determination of lead in food by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Methods Based on the microwave digestion, the applicability of the other two methods was compared. Results The results of 3 different pretreatment methods were no statistically significant difference, and the relative standard deviation was less than 10%.The precision of microwave digestion method was higher than that of the other 2 methods, and the recovery and precision were improved after adding the matrix modifier. Conclusion There are no significant difference among the 3 pretreatment methods, which can be selected according to the actual situation. |
| |
| Keywords: | graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry pretreatment foods lead |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《食品安全质量检测学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《食品安全质量检测学报》下载全文 |
|
