GLDAS Noah模型水文产品与中国地面观测及卫星观测数据的对比 |
| |
引用本文: | 王文,邵银龙,崔巍,王鹏.GLDAS Noah模型水文产品与中国地面观测及卫星观测数据的对比[J].水电能源科学,2017,35(5):1-6. |
| |
作者姓名: | 王文 邵银龙 崔巍 王鹏 |
| |
作者单位: | 河海大学 水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室, 江苏 南京 210098 |
| |
摘 要: | 全球陆面数据同化系统(GLDAS)是全球水循环研究的重要数据源,基于重力卫星(GRACE)观测数据、中国的地面降水与径流观测数据,从模拟数据与观测数据之间的偏差、相关性及时空分布一致性角度,对GLDAS两个版本(GLDAS-1及GLDAS-2)的Noah模型模拟水文产品进行了评估。结果表明,GLDAS与GRACE TWS陆地水蓄量(TWS)变化情况在中国大部分地区一致性较差,且GLDAS-1与GLDAS-2均不能充分反映GRACE TWS数据的季节性变化规律;GLDAS-1与GLDAS-2模拟的中国外流区的径流明显低于观测径流,同时长江流域与松花江流域GLDAS-2模拟径流的精度远比GLDAS-1模拟径流的精度高;GLDAS-1与GLDAS-2在中国的外流流域的蒸散发均呈高估现象,且GLDAS-1的高估程度大于GLDAS-2。
|
关 键 词: | 全球陆面数据同化系统 Noah模型 径流 陆地水蓄量 蒸散发 |
Comparison of GLDAS Noah Model Hydrological Outputs with Ground Observations and Satellite Observations in China |
| |
Abstract: | The Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS) is an important data source for global water cycle research. Using ground-observed precipitation and discharge and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite observed terrestrial water storage (TWS) data, GLDAS-1 Noah model outputs and GLDAS-2 Noah model outputs were compared and evaluated in terms of their bias, correlation and spatial-temporal consistency with observations. The results show that the change rates of TWS data by GLDAS and GRACE do not match well in most areas of China, and both GLDAS-1 and GLDAS-2 are not capable enough of capturing the seasonal variation in monthly TWS change observed by GRACE. Runoff is underestimated in the exorheic basins over China, and runoff simulations of GLDAS-2 are much more accurate than those of GLDAS-1 for two of the three major river basins of China investigated in this study. Evapotranspiration is overestimated in the exorheic basins in China by both GLDAS-1 and GLDAS-2, whereas the overestimation of ET by GLDAS-2 is less than that by GLDAS-1. |
| |
Keywords: | global land data assimilation system Noah model runoff water storage evapotranspiration |
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录! |
| 点击此处可从《水电能源科学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《水电能源科学》下载全文 |
|