Relationship between patient reports of urinary incontinence symptoms and quality of life measures

The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of normal growth and development on the Peer Assessment Rating index between 12 and 22 years of age. The sample consisted of 49 nonorthodontic subjects (24 male and 25 females) from the Nijmegen Growth Study. The mean age at the first observation was 12.2 +/- 0.7 years and at the second observation 22.1 +/- 0.6 years. The dental casts at these ages were scored with the Peer Assessment Rating index. The influence of the Angle classification and the treatment need on changes over time in the Peer Assessment Rating score were evaluated. The mean changes in the PAR scores over time between cases that have more than 30% improvement to those that have less than 30% improvement were calculated. The results indicate that there were no significant differences between the mean Peer Assessment Rating score at 12 years of age (12.20 +/- 0.91) and at 22 years of age (12.45 +/- 1.28), but there were relevant differences in individual cases. The changes were irrespective of the Angle classification or the treatment need. Changes over time in the weighted Peer Assessment Rating score were mainly correlated to changes in the anterior crossbite and the overjet. This correlation may be influenced, however, by the applied weighting factor for those occlusal traits.