|
|||||
|
|
An evaluation of LIDAR- and IFSAR-derived digital elevation models in leaf-on conditions with USGS Level 1 and Level 2 DEMs |
|
| Authors: | Michael E Hodgson John R JensenLaura Schmidt Steve SchillBruce Davis |
| Affiliation: | a Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA b Baruch Marine Science Laboratory, Georgetown, SC 29585, USA c GeoMetrics, Inc., Columbia, SC 29210, USA d Earth Science Applications Directorate, NASA Stennis Space Center, Stennis, MS 39529, USA |
| Abstract: | An assessment of four different remote sensing based methods for deriving digital elevation models (DEMs) was conducted in a flood-prone watershed in North Carolina. New airborne LIDAR (light detecting and ranging) and IFSAR (interferometric synthetic aperture radar (SAR)) data were collected and corresponding DEMs created. These new sources were compared to two methods: Gestalt Photomapper (GPM) and contour-to-grid, used by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) for creating DEMs. Survey-grade points (1470) for five different land cover classes were used as reference points. One unique aspect of this study was the LIDAR and IFSAR data were collected during leaf-on conditions. Analyses of absolute elevation accuracy and terrain slope were conducted. The LIDAR- and contour-to-grid derived DEMs exhibited the highest overall absolute elevation accuracies. Elevation accuracy was found to vary with land cover categories. Elevation accuracy also decreased with increasing slopes—but only for the scrub/shrub land cover category. Appreciable terrain slope errors for the reference points were found with all methods. |
| Keywords: | LIDAR IFSAR DEM Elevation accuracy |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ | |