首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同折流板结构螺旋折流板换热器传热性能的比较(英文)
引用本文:董聪,陈亚平,吴嘉峰. 不同折流板结构螺旋折流板换热器传热性能的比较(英文)[J]. 中国化学工程学报, 2015, 23(1): 255-261. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2014.10.014
作者姓名:董聪  陈亚平  吴嘉峰
作者单位:1.School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China;2.School of Light Industry, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
基金项目:Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(50976022,51276035);the Provincial Science and Technology Innovation and Transformation of Achievements of Special Fund Project of Jiangsu Province(BY2011155)
摘    要:Numerical simulations were performed on flow and heat transfer performances of heat exchangers having six helical baffles of different baffle shapes and assembly configurations, i.e., two trisection baffle schemes, two quadrant baffle schemes, and two continuous helical baffle schemes. The temperature contour or the pressure contour and velocity contour plots with superimposed velocity vectors on meridian, transverse and unfolded concentric hexagonal slices are presented to obtain a full angular view. For the six helix baffled heat exchangers, the different patterns of the single vortex secondary flow and the shortcut leakage flow were depicted as wel as the heat transfer properties were compared. The results show that the optimum scheme among the six configurations is a circumferential overlap trisection helix baffled heat exchanger with a baffle incline angle of 20° (20°TCO) scheme with an anti-shortcut baffle structure, which exhibits the second highest pressure dropΔpo, the highest overal heat transfer coefficient K, shel-side heat transfer coefficient ho and shel-side average comprehensive index ho/Δpo.

关 键 词:Helix baffled heat exchanger  Trisection baffle  Quadrant baffle  Continuous baffle  Circumferential overlap baffle  Secondary flow  Heat transfer  Numerical simulation  
收稿时间:2013-05-20

Comparison of heat transfer performances of helix baffled heat exchangers with different baffle configurations
Cong Dong;Yaping Chen;Jiafeng Wu. Comparison of heat transfer performances of helix baffled heat exchangers with different baffle configurations[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015, 23(1): 255-261. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2014.10.014
Authors:Cong Dong  Yaping Chen  Jiafeng Wu
Affiliation:1.School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China;2.School of Light Industry, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
Abstract:Numerical simulations were performed on flow and heat transfer performances of heat exchangers having six helical baffles of different baffle shapes and assembly configurations, i.e., two trisection baffle schemes, two quadrant baffle schemes, and two continuous helical baffle schemes. The temperature contour or the pressure contour and velocity contour plots with superimposed velocity vectors on meridian, transverse and unfolded concentric hexagonal slices are presented to obtain a full angular view. For the six helix baffled heat exchangers, the different patterns of the single vortex secondary flow and the shortcut leakage flow were depicted as wel as the heat transfer properties were compared. The results show that the optimum scheme among the six configurations is a circumferential overlap trisection helix baffled heat exchanger with a baffle incline angle of 20° (20°TCO) scheme with an anti-shortcut baffle structure, which exhibits the second highest pressure dropΔpo, the highest overal heat transfer coefficient K, shel-side heat transfer coefficient ho and shel-side average comprehensive index ho/Δpo.
Keywords:Helix baffled heat exchanger Trisection baffle  Quadrant baffle  Continuous baffle  Circumferential overlap baffle  Secondary flow  Heat transfer  Numerical simulation
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国化学工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国化学工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号