首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

几种行波测距算法的比较
引用本文:李友军,王俊生,郑玉平,周文. 几种行波测距算法的比较[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2001, 25(14): 36-39
作者姓名:李友军  王俊生  郑玉平  周文
作者单位:国家电力公司电力自动化研究院继电保护研究所,
摘    要:介绍了4种行波测距算法,并从理论上对这些算法的优缺点进行了分析。反射波法的测距精度较高,但是反射波头难以准确检测,容易识别距;零模波头法的测距精度略低,但实现简单,受干扰较少,结果可靠性高,双端测距建议直接使用第1个线模波头,结果具有很高的精度和可靠性,无需引入零模分量的双端测距算法,EMTP仿真结果表明所述观点正确,可靠。

关 键 词:继电保护 行波测距算法 电力系统 输电线路
收稿时间:1900-01-01
修稿时间:1900-01-01

COMPARISON OF SEVERAL ALGORITHMS OF TRAVELLING WAVE BASED FAULT LOCATION
Li Youjun,Wang Junsheng,Zheng Yuping,Zhou Wen. COMPARISON OF SEVERAL ALGORITHMS OF TRAVELLING WAVE BASED FAULT LOCATION[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2001, 25(14): 36-39
Authors:Li Youjun  Wang Junsheng  Zheng Yuping  Zhou Wen
Abstract:This paper compares four algorithms of travelling wave based fault location.The precision of the algorithm based on the wave surge reflection is higher than that of the algorithm based on earth mode.But the time measure of wave surge reflection is difficult while it is easy for earth mode surge.If the data got from the both sides of line are used for locating fault,only the aerial mode waveform is suggested to use and it is not necessary to use earth mode waveform.EMTP simulation results show that the views above are correct.
Keywords:protective relaying  travelling wave  fault location  algorithm
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《电力系统自动化》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《电力系统自动化》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号