Equation of state of3He near its liquid-vapor critical point |
| |
Authors: | Robert P Behringer Ted Doiron Horst Meyer |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina;(2) Present address: Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey |
| |
Abstract: | We report high-resolution measurements of the pressure coefficient (P/T) for3He in both the one-phase and two-phase regions close to the critical point. These include data on 40 isochores over the intervals–0.1t+0.1 and–0.2+0.2, wheret=(T–T
c
)/T
c
and =(–
c
)/
c
. We have determined the discontinuity (P/T) of (P/T) between the one-phase and the two-phase regions along the coexistence curve as a function of . The asymptotic behavior of (1/) (P/T) versus near the critical point gives a power law with an exponent (+–1)–1=1.39±0.02 for0.010.2 or–1×10
–2t–10
–6
, from which we deduce =1.14±0.01, using =0.361 determined from the shape of the coexistence curve. An analysis of the discontinuity (P/T) with a correction-to-scaling term gives =1.17±0.02. The quoted errors are fromstatistics alone. Furthermore, we combine our data with heat capacity results by Brown and Meyer to calculate (/T)
c
as a function oft. In the two-phase region the slope (2/T
2)c is different from that in the one-phase region. These findings are discussed in the light of the predictions from simple scaling and more refined theories and model calculations. For the isochores 0 we form a scaling plot to test whether the data follow simple scaling, which assumes antisymmetry of – (
c
,t) as a function of on both sides of the critical isochore. We find that indeed this plot shows that the assumption of simple scaling holds reasonably well for our data over the ranget0.1. A fit of our data to the linear model approximation is obtained for0.10 andt0.02, giving a value of =1.16±0.02. Beyond this range, deviations between the fit and the data are greater than the experimental scatter. Finally we discuss the (P/T) data analysis for
4
He by Kierstead. A power law plot of (1/) P/T) versus belowT
c
leads to =1.13±0.10. An analysis with a correction-to-scaling term gives =1.06±0.02. In contrast to
3
He, the slopes (2/T
2)c above and belowT
c
are only marginally different.Work supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|