Intelligence, training, and employment.

Validity coefficients of cognitive ability tests for predicting job performance are impressive. Nevertheless, a need exists to supplement cognitive ability tests with additional predictors to maximize validity and utility and to minimize adverse impact, even for tests that are unbiased according to psychometric criteria. An agenda for research and practice is presented that includes building on the existing validity of cognitive ability tests for job selection by expanding both the set of constructs used to predict job performance and the set of performance criteria used to quantify job performance. Even greater benefits are likely to be associated with advances in knowledge about effective training. Such advances will require substantial investment in well-designed, large-scale studies and facile adaptation of lessons from other domains, such as cognitive psychology, to the organizational-training context. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)