首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms in hybrid Kansei engineering system for product form design
Affiliation:1. Department of Industrial Design, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan 70101, Taiwan, ROC;2. Department of Multimedia and Entertainment Science, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 1, Nantai Street, Yungkang District, Tainan 71005, Taiwan, ROC;1. Department of Interior Architecture Design, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea;2. Graduate School of Culture Technology, KAIST, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea;1. Department of Industrial Design, Tunghai University, No. 1727, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Xitun District, Taichung 40704, Taiwan, ROC;2. Department of Creative Product Design, Asia University, No. 500, Lioufeng Rd., Wufeng, Taichung 41354, Taiwan, ROC;3. Department of Industrial Design, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Rd., Tainan City 701, Taiwan, ROC
Abstract:Understanding the affective needs of customers is crucial to the success of product design. Hybrid Kansei engineering system (HKES) is an expert system capable of generating products in accordance with the affective responses. HKES consists of two subsystems: forward Kansei engineering system (FKES) and backward Kansei engineering system (BKES). In previous studies, HKES was based primarily on single-objective optimization, such that only one optimal design was obtained in a given simulation run. The use of multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) in HKES was only attempted using the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II), such that very little work has been conducted to compare different MOEAs. In this paper, we propose an approach to HKES combining the methodologies of support vector regression (SVR) and MOEAs. In BKES, we constructed predictive models using SVR. In FKES, optimal design alternatives were generated using MOEAs. Representative designs were obtained using fuzzy c-means algorithm for clustering the Pareto front into groups. To enable comparison, we employed three typical MOEAs: NSGA-II, the Pareto envelope-based selection algorithm-II (PESA-II), and the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm-2 (SPEA2). A case study of vase form design was provided to demonstrate the proposed approach. Our results suggest that NSGA-II has good convergence performance and hybrid performance; in contrast, SPEA2 provides the strong diversity required by designers. The proposed HKES is applicable to a wide variety of product design problems, while providing creative design ideas through the exploration of numerous Pareto optimal solutions.
Keywords:Product form design  Kansei engineering  Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms  Support vector regression
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号