首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

深部资源勘探成果思考及开采过渡方式选择
引用本文:李新,李泽营,许雁超,刘万山. 深部资源勘探成果思考及开采过渡方式选择[J]. 金属矿山, 2009, 39(8): 91
作者姓名:李新  李泽营  许雁超  刘万山
作者单位:河北钢铁集团矿业有限公司庙沟铁矿
摘    要:概述庙沟铁矿深部资源地质勘探所取得的有关Ⅱ号矿体围岩性质、产状、厚度、尖灭、矿石质量、结构、构造以及铁矿石资源量等勘探成果。从本次勘探存在问题、勘探问题解决建议2个方面,论述庙沟铁矿深部资源地质勘探后所必须思考的问题,在此基础上,对露天转地下2种开采过渡方式的经济效益进行对比分析,得出 “露天扩界开采至372 m水平转入地下”的开采过渡方式是最合理的开采过渡方式。

关 键 词:深部资源勘探  开采过渡方式  思考  对比  

Thinking on the Results of Deep Resource Exploration and Selection of Mining Transition Mode
Li Xin,Li Zeying,Xu Yanchao,Liu Wanshan. Thinking on the Results of Deep Resource Exploration and Selection of Mining Transition Mode[J]. Metal Mine, 2009, 39(8): 91
Authors:Li Xin  Li Zeying  Xu Yanchao  Liu Wanshan
Affiliation:Miaogou Iron Mine, Hebei Steel Mining Co., Ltd.
Abstract:The results of the geological exploration of deep resources at Miaogou Iron Mine are described, including the country rock properties, occurrence, thickness, wedging out, ore properties, structure and texture, and iron ore quantity of orebody II.The problems and solutions of this exploration and the issues needing to be considered after this exploration are discussed.Based on this, the economic benefits of the two methods of the transition from open-pit to underground mining are compared and it is concluded that the most rational plan is to transit the mining to underground at 372 m level.
Keywords:Deep resource exploration  Mining transition mode  Thinking  Comparison
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《金属矿山》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《金属矿山》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号