| 目前可行的热能储存技术之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 印佳敏,吴占松.目前可行的热能储存技术之比较[J].节能技术,2005,23(5):444-446,464. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 印佳敏 吴占松 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 清华大学热科学与动力工程教育部重点实验室,北京,100084;清华大学热科学与动力工程教育部重点实验室,北京,100084 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目前,中国电网的“峰谷差”问题十分严重,本文就四种主要的蓄能技术：抽水蓄能、压缩空气蓄能、蓄热、蓄冷进行简单的介绍和比较,并评价不同技术路线之间的优劣.通过分析可知,抽水蓄能受到地理条件的限制;压缩空气蓄能系统启动时间短;水蓄热电锅炉系统适于中小型空调系统;冰蓄冷是在解决电力峰谷差诸方法中转换效率最高.
|
| 关 键 词： | 峰谷差 抽水蓄能 压缩空气蓄能 蓄热 蓄冷 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-6339（2005）05-0444-03 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-09-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-09-042005-09-13 |
Comparation of Present Sustainable Thermal Energy Storage Technologies |
| |
| YIN Jia-min,WU Zhan-song.Comparation of Present Sustainable Thermal Energy Storage Technologies[J].Energy Conservation Technology,2005,23(5):444-446,464. |
| |
| Authors: | YIN Jia-min WU Zhan-song |
| |
| Affiliation: | Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering, Ministry of Education of China, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China |
| |
| Abstract: | At present,the problem of peak-valley regulation in Chinese electricity networks is very serious.This paper gives brief introduction and comparation of four technologies: hydraulic pumped storage,compressed-air energy storage,heat storage and cool storage,and estimates the advantages of them.Through analyzing,we know that: hydraulic pumped storage gets geographic restriction;compressed-air energy storage has short start-up and stop time;water storage electrical boiler system fits for small and medium scale air-conditioning system;ice storage has the highest transfer efficiency in all these methods. |
| |
| Keywords: | peak-valley hydraulic pumped storage compressed-air energy storage heat storage coolstorage |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
