Crypt-equivalent algebraic specifications

Summary Equivalence is a fundamental notion for the semantic analysis of algebraic specifications. In this paper the notion of “crypt-equivalence” is introduced and studied w.r.t. two “loose” approaches to the semantics of an algebraic specificationT: the class of all first-order models ofT and the class of all term-generated models ofT. Two specifications are called crypt-equivalent if for one specification there exists a predicate logic formula which implicitly defines an expansion (by new functions) of every model of that specification in such a way that the expansion (after forgetting unnecessary functions) is homologous to a model of the other specification, and if vice versa there exists another predicate logic formula with the same properties for the other specification. We speak of “first-order crypt-equivalence” if this holds for all first-order models, and of “inductive crypt-equivalence” if this holds for all term-generated models. Characterizations and structural properties of these notions are studied. In particular, it is shown that firstorder crypt-equivalence is equivalent to the existence of explicit definitions and that in case of “positive definability” two first-order crypt-equivalent specifications admit the same categories of models and homomorphisms. Similarly, two specifications which are inductively crypt-equivalent via sufficiently complete implicit definitions determine the same associated categories. Moreover, crypt-equivalence is compared with other notions of equivalence for algebraic specifications: in particular, it is shown that first-order cryptequivalence is strictly coarser than “abstract semantic equivalence” and that inductive crypt-equivalence is strictly finer than “inductive simulation equivalence” and “implementation equivalence”.