Analysis of the evaluation process of the research performance: An empirical case |
| |
| Authors: | Adela García-Aracil Antonio Gutiérrez Gracia Marián Pérez-Marín |
| |
| Affiliation: | (1) Institute for Innovation and Knowledge Management, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), Technical University of Valencia, Camino de Vera, s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain;(2) Institute for Innovation and Knowledge Management, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), Technical University of Valencia, Spain;(3) Institute for Innovation and Knowledge Management, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), Technical University of Valencia, Spain |
| |
| Abstract: | Summary In this paper we analyze the objectivity of the peer review process of research performance by research groups in the scientific
and technological Valencian system, over the period 1998-2002. For that purpose, we use qualitative and quantitative indicators
to assess which of them are the most important to determine a research group as excellent one, based on peer review evaluation
methodology. The results show that excellence appears to be driven only by publications in SCI/SSCI and the number of sexenios, and suggest that the peer review process is not as objective as we expected. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
