首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Does technology empower urban youth? The relationship of technology use to self-efficacy
Affiliation:1. School of Psychological Sciences, Redmond Barry Building, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia;2. Department of Telecommunication, Information Studies, and Media, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA;1. Department of Marketing, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA;2. Department of Management Studies, Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302017, India;3. Indian Institute of Management Trichy, India;1. AG Corporate Semantic Web, Institute of Computer Science, Free University of Berlin, Germany;2. Opus College of Business, University of St. Thomas, Minneapolis Campus, 1000 LaSalle Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55403, USA;3. Montpellier Business School, Montpellier Research in Management, 2300 Avenue des Moulins, 34185 Montpellier, France
Abstract:Many propose technology as a tool for empowerment of lower SES urban students, but little research has investigated the relationship between technology and empowerment for this population. We investigate how different aspects of technology use and ownership could empower urban youth through increasing their self-efficacy. Instead of simply a general measure of self-efficacy, we focus on several important domains related to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) subjects including technological, mathematics/science, academic, and general self-efficacy. Our investigation incorporates many aspects of technology use by considering first level digital divide characteristics, such as ownership and total amount of use, and second level digital divide characteristics, such as specific communication, multimedia, content creation, and social networking activities. We use a unique survey of fourth and fifth grade students who were given a laptop, thereby controlling for the typical disparity in computer ownership and access among lower SES students. We found that technology use influences each domain of efficacy in specific ways, indicating the importance of considering multiple domains of self-efficacy. Most notably, frequency of communication and especially frequency of email use related to all four domains of efficacy and frequency of playing games related to general, mathematics/science, and academic efficacy. However, social networking activities had a negative association with academic and general efficacy. We conclude by considering the importance of multiple domains in self-efficacy research and policy implications for students and their schools.
Keywords:Digital inequalities  Digital divide  STEM subjects  Elementary school students  Internet activities
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号