Variables influencing tumor dosimetry in radioimmunotherapy of CEA-expressing cancers with anti-CEA and antimucin monoclonal antibodies

In this study, we examined the factors that may influence tumor dosimetry in the radioimmunotherapy of solid, CEA-expressing cancers. METHODS: Data from 119 tumors in 93 patients with CEA-expressing cancers were analyzed. The patients underwent radioimmunotherapy with the 131I-labeled IgG1 anti-CEA antibodies NP-4 (Ka = 10(8) M-1) or MN-14 (Ka = 10(9) M-1), its humanized form hMN-14, as well as the anticolon-specific antigen-p (CSAp) antibody, Mu-9. For dosimetry, the biodistribution, targeting kinetics and cumulated activity of tumors and organs were determined from planar and SPECT imaging. RESULTS: An inverse logarithmic relationship between tumor size and antibody uptake was found for both anti-CEA antibodies, whereas no such relationship was found for Mu-9. The absolute tumor uptake was identified as the most important factor determining the radiation dose to the tumor (r = 0.9), with the biological half-life of the antibody in the tumor being of secondary importance (r = 0.5). No significant difference in tumor uptake was found between both anti-CEA antibodies, despite their tenfold difference in affinity. At comparable masses, colorectal and medullary thyroid cancers had significantly higher tumor uptakes (p = 0.02), as well as tumor-to-red marrow dose ratios, than other cancer types. The tumor half-lives of the anti-CEA antibodies were significantly lower in colorectal than in all other tumor types (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In radioimmunotherapy, tumor uptake appears to be the most important dose-determining factor. Differences in antibody affinity are reflected by differences in the biological half-life, not the absolute uptake. Especially favorable conditions for anti-CEA antibodies seem to prevail in colorectal cancer patients having minimal disease, as well as in medullary thyroid cancer, where cytotoxic tumor doses might be expected. Antimucin antibodies may have a particular advantage in the treatment of patients with larger colorectal tumors.