首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Criteria for chemical equilibrium with application to methane steam reforming
Affiliation:1. Laboratorio de Procesos Catalíticos, Dpto. de Ingeniería Química, ITHES (UBA-CONICET), Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina;2. Grupo de Procesos Catalíticos (PROCAT), Universidad de Málaga (UMA), Málaga, Spain;1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;2. ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Technical Unit for Renewable Energy Sources (UTRINN), via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy;1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran;2. Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Petroleum and Gas, University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract:A literature survey reveals significant inaccuracy of the prediction of equilibrium models. A thermodynamic analysis is presented to show that the equilibrium calculations rest on a critical assumption of reversible heat exchange between a reactive system and its surrounding. Indeed, a correct application of the energy conservation and entropy balance equation leads to a modified Gibbs function. Minimization of the modified Gibbs function happens to be identical to maximization of the total entropy generation. The actual chemical equilibrium is shown through a methane steam reforming, as an illustrative example, to be correctly predicted by kinetic modeling. The state of chemical equilibrium does not necessarily correspond to maximum entropy generation. Once a chemical equilibrium has been established, both the total entropy generation and the modified Gibbs function remain unaltered and independent of time.
Keywords:Chemical equilibrium  Entropy generation  Modified gibbs energy  Kinetic model  Steam reforming
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号