首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Does risk information change the acceptance of hydrogen refueling stations in the general Japanese population?
Affiliation:1. Centre for Social Research, University of Salford, Greater Manchester M5 4WT, UK;2. Centre for Integrated Energy Research and Sustainability Research Institute, Energy Building, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK;3. Centre for Transport & Society, Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK;4. Institute for Environmental and Sustainability Communication (INFU), Leuphana University Lüneburg, Scharnhorststraße 1, D-21335 Lüneburg, Germany;1. Graduate Program in Technology Policy, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea;2. Department of Information & Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea;3. Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy & Environment, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, 232 Gongreung-Ro, Nowon-Gu Seoul, 01811, Republic of Korea;1. Institute for Environmental and Sustainability Communication (INFU), Leuphana University Luneburg, Universitätsallee 1, 21335 Lüneburg, Germany;2. CIEMAT, Centro de Investigacion Sociotecnica (CISOT), Gran Vía de les Corts Catalanes, 604, 4, 2a, 08007, Barcelona, Spain;3. Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds. Energy Building, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK;4. Fraunhofer Institut für System und Innovationsforschung ISI, Breslauer Str. 48, 76139 Karlsruhe, Germany;5. Chair of Statistics, Georg-August University Göttingen, Humboldtalle 3, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
Abstract:Hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs) are inevitable infrastructure for the utility of fuel cell vehicles, but they can raise people's safety concerns. We analyzed whether information on the risk/safety measures changed people's acceptance of HRSs. Respondents were provided those information and asked to rate their acceptance of an HRS placement either beside their home or at the gas station closest to their home. The respondents' perception of the risk of HRSs and their attitudes on environmental issues are analyzed by factor analyses. The results show that provision of the quantitative risk information and risk acceptance criteria increased the acceptability of HRS in proximity to the homes of respondents (P < 0.1) but decreased the acceptability of HRS at the nearest gas station. Factor analyses suggest that risk information on HRS alleviates the respondents' feelings of dread or uncertainty, leading to better acceptance. Our study should promote improved risk communication prior to HRS installation.
Keywords:Factor analysis  Hydrogen refueling stations  Public acceptance  Risk assessment  Risk perception  Safety measure
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号