A review of the J and I integrals and their implications for crack growth resistance and toughness in ductile fracture

The application of the J and the I-integrals to ductile fracture are discussed. It is shown that, because of the finite size of the fracture process zone (FPZ), the initiation value of the J-integral is specimen dependent even if the plastic constraint conditions are constant. The paradox that the I-integral for steady state elasto-plastic crack growth is apparently zero is examined. It is shown that, if the FPZ at the crack tip is modelled, the I-integral is equal to the work performed in its fracture. Thus it is essential to model the fracture process zone in ductile fracture. The I-integral is then used to demonstrate that the breakdown in applicability of the J-integral to crack growth in ductile fracture is as much due to the inclusion in the J-integral of progressively more work performed in the plastic zone as it is to non-proportional deformation during unloading behind the crack tip. Thus J _R -curves combine the essential work of fracture performed in the FPZ with the plastic work performed outside of the FPZ. These two work terms scale differently and produce size and geometry dependence. It is suggested that the future direction of modelling in ductile fracture should be to include the FPZ. Strides have already been made in this direction.