首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

办公光环境舒适性主观评价指标的研究
引用本文:蔡丹丹,潘毅群,黄治钟. 办公光环境舒适性主观评价指标的研究[J]. 建筑节能, 2013, 0(12): 62-67
作者姓名:蔡丹丹  潘毅群  黄治钟
作者单位:[1]同济大学机械与能源工程学院,上海201804 [2]同济大学中德工程学院,上海201804
摘    要:确定了影响办公光环境舒适性的主观评价指标,运用层次分析法(Analyical Hierarchy Process,简称AHP法)和德尔菲专家调查法准确地得出各因素对办公光环境舒适性的影响程度,结果表明,眩光、看物体的清晰程度、颜色真实性以及明暗对比合适度是影响办公光环境舒适度的主要因素,其权重值分别为29.55%、17.59%、16.77%和14.44%。因此,在进行办公光环境设计时,应首要考虑满足权重值高的主观指标。该结果不仅可用于评价办公照明环境质量,还可用于指导办公照明环境的设计。

关 键 词:主观评价指标  AHP法  权重  德尔菲专家调查法

Subjective Evaluation Indicators of Lighting Environment Comfort in Office
CAI Dan-dan,PAN Yi-qun,HUANG Zhi-zhong. Subjective Evaluation Indicators of Lighting Environment Comfort in Office[J]. Construction Conserves Energy, 2013, 0(12): 62-67
Authors:CAI Dan-dan  PAN Yi-qun  HUANG Zhi-zhong
Affiliation:2 (1.School of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China; 2.Sino-German College of Applied Sciences, Tongii University, Shanghai 201804, China)
Abstract:This paper investigates and determines subjective evaluation indicators for office lighting environment comfort. Analytical Hi- erorchy Process and Delphi Experts Investigation Method ore utilized to obtain the subjective evaluation indicators of influence on lighting en- vironment comfort in office. The results show that Glare, Visual Clarity, Color Authenticity, Light and Shade Contrast are the main factors that influence lighting environment comfort in office, and the corresponding weights are 29.55%, 17.59%, 16.77% and 14.44%, respectively. The subjective indicators of high weights ore highly recommended to be considered when the lighting environment is designed in office. This result is not only used to evaluate the lighting environment quality but also used to guide the design of lighting environment in office.
Keywords:subjective evaluation indicators  analytical hierarchy process  weights  Delphi experts investigation method
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号