首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

2×200 MW级某天然气热电联产项目的生命周期环境影响评价
引用本文:宋国辉,唐璐,姜武,肖军.2×200 MW级某天然气热电联产项目的生命周期环境影响评价[J].中国电力,2014,47(12):149-155.
作者姓名:宋国辉  唐璐  姜武  肖军
作者单位:1. 江苏省电力设计院,江苏 南京 211102;2. 苏州热工研究院有限公司,江苏 苏州 215004;3. 东南大学 能源热转换及其过程测控教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210096
摘    要:江苏省近年来大力发展燃气热电联产项目。2012年江苏省天然气利用量居全国首位。对江苏省2×200 MW某天然气热电联产项目进行了生命周期环境影响评价。生命周期评价(LCA)结果表明,对于该燃气热电联产项目,非生物资源消耗(CADP)、全球暖化(GWP)和酸化(AP)是相对重要的环境影响类型,可吸入无机物(RI)相对较为次要。生产运行阶段对各类环境影响类型,尤其是CADP和GWP均有重要贡献;天然气生产和管道输运则对AP和RI有显著贡献;建设拆除阶段对各类环境影响类型的贡献均较小。与燃煤发电相比,天然气热电联产在环境影响方面具有较大优势,其GWP、AP和RI分别约为煤电的20%、15%和5%;但天然气的稀缺性造成了天然气发电在非生物资源消耗方面存在巨大劣势,其CADP是煤电的3~3.5倍。

关 键 词:天然气  热电联产  生命周期  环境影响  类型  评价  
收稿时间:2014-09-14

Life-Cycle Environmental Impact Assessment of a Typical 2×200 MW Natural Gas Combined Cycle-Combined Heat and Power Plant
SONG Guo-hui,TANG Lu,JIANG Wu,XIAO Jun.Life-Cycle Environmental Impact Assessment of a Typical 2×200 MW Natural Gas Combined Cycle-Combined Heat and Power Plant[J].Electric Power,2014,47(12):149-155.
Authors:SONG Guo-hui  TANG Lu  JIANG Wu  XIAO Jun
Affiliation:1. Jiangsu Electric Power Design Institution, Nanjing 211102, China;2. Suzhou Nuclear Power Institute, Suzhou 215004, China;3. Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
Abstract:Jiangsu Province has witnessed vigorous development of natural gas combined cycle(NGCC)-combined heat and power (CHP) plant in recent years. In 2012, the utilization of natural gas in Jiangsu Province ranked first in China. The life cycle assessment of a typical 2×200 MW natural gas combined cycle-combined heat and power plant is proposed in this paper. The life cycle assessment(LCA) results indicate that the indicators, such as Chinese abiotic depletion potential (CADP), global warning potential (GWP) and acidification potential (AP), are important environmental impact categories in this type of co-generation plant. In contrast, the indicator of respiratory inorganics (RI) is minor. Plant operation contributes to all environmental impact categories, especially CADP and GWP. Natural gas exploitation and pipeline transportation only markedly contribute to AP and RI. Finally, construction & decommissioning contributes less to all the indicators. Compared with coal-fired power, natural gas has greater advantages in terms of environmental impacts. Compared with coal-fired power, the GWP, AP and RI of natural gas-fired power account for 20%, 15% and 5% of those of coal-fired power, respectively. However, due to the scarcity of natural gas resources, the CADP of natural gas-fired power is 3~3.5 times of that of coal-based power.
Keywords:natural gas  combined heat and power  life cycle  environmental impact  categories  assessment  
点击此处可从《中国电力》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国电力》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号