首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

刚柔组合搅拌桨与刚性桨调控流场结构的对比
引用本文:刘作华,曾启琴,杨鲜艳,刘仁龙,王运东,陶长元. 刚柔组合搅拌桨与刚性桨调控流场结构的对比[J]. 化工学报, 2014, 65(6): 2078-2084. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.06.018
作者姓名:刘作华  曾启琴  杨鲜艳  刘仁龙  王运东  陶长元
作者单位:1. 重庆大学化学化工学院, 重庆 400044;2. 清华大学化学工程系, 北京 100084
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2012CBA01203);清华大学化学工程联合国家重点实验室开放课题(SKL-ChE-12A02);中央高校基本科研业务费跨学科类重大项目(CDJZR12228801);重庆市自然科学基金重点项目(CSTC2012JJB0006)。
摘    要:高黏度流体处于层流状态时,普遍存在的混合隔离区,降低了流体的混合效率。减小或消除隔离区,是实现流体高效混合的基本途径。采用实验研究与数值模拟相结合的方法,对刚性六直叶涡轮桨(刚性桨)和刚柔组合六直叶涡轮桨(组合桨)的流场结构进行研究,对比分析了两种桨叶在相同功耗(3 kW·m-3)时的轴向、径向和切向的速度矢量图、速度云图以及速度分布散点图。结果表明,刚性桨的能量集中在桨叶尖端部分,远离桨叶区域的流体速度很小甚至为0 m·s-1;而组合桨可将能量从桨叶尖端扩散至全槽,使槽内流体均具有一定的流速,提高了混合效率,且显色实验与数值模拟结果一致,组合桨体系的混合隔离区在短时间内就可消除,混合良好,而刚性桨体系的混合隔离区始终存在,混合效果不佳。

关 键 词:混合  混沌  搅拌槽  刚柔组合桨  数值模拟  
收稿时间:2013-09-04
修稿时间:2014-01-06

Flow field structure with rigid-flexible impeller and rigid impeller
LIU Zuohua,ZENG Qiqin,YANG Xianyan,LIU Renlong,WANG Yundong,TAO Changyuan. Flow field structure with rigid-flexible impeller and rigid impeller[J]. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering(China), 2014, 65(6): 2078-2084. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.06.018
Authors:LIU Zuohua  ZENG Qiqin  YANG Xianyan  LIU Renlong  WANG Yundong  TAO Changyuan
Affiliation:1. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;2. Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Abstract:Isolated mixing region often appears in the high-viscosity fluid with laminar flow in a stirred vessel, reducing fluid mixing efficiency. Diminishing or eliminating isolated mixing region improves the mixing efficiency and reduces mixing energy consumption. Experimental and computational studies were carried out to compare the flow field structures with rigid Rushton turbine impeller (rigid RT impeller) and rigid-flexible Rushton turbine impeller (combination RT impeller). Analyses were carried out on axial, radial and tangential velocity vector plots, velocity contours and velocity distribution scatter plots at the same time power consumption (3 kW·m-3)with these two impellers. Results show that the energy concentrates at the tip of rigid RT impeller and the fluid velocity away from the impeller is small, even at 0 m·s-1, while for combination RT impeller, the energy distributes well in the stirred tank so that the fluid gains certain velocity everywhere. The numerical simulation results agree with experimental results. The combination RT impeller improves mixing efficiency by eliminating isolated mixing regions, while rigid RT impeller presents a poor mixing efficiency since isolated mixing regions always exist.
Keywords:mixing  chaos  stirred vessel  rigid-flexible impeller  numerical simulation  
点击此处可从《化工学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《化工学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号