| 300 MW燃煤机组脱硫工程一炉一塔与二炉一塔方案比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 戎淑群,邵峰.300 MW燃煤机组脱硫工程一炉一塔与二炉一塔方案比较[J].热力发电,2005,34(10):4-6. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 戎淑群 邵峰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江天地环保工程有限公司,浙江杭州310012 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对300MW燃煤机组脱硫工程一炉一塔方案与二炉一塔方案的运行维护、场地布置、投资成本和运行成本进行了比较。分析认为，一炉一塔方案有诸多优点，虽一次性投资较高，但运行成本较二炉一塔低，且能适应今后严格的环保要求。
|
| 关 键 词： | 300 MW燃煤机组 脱硫工程 吸收塔 一炉一塔 二炉一塔 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-3364(2005)10-0004-03 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-08-22 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年8月22日 |
COMPARISON BETWEEN SCHEME OF ONE BOILER WITH ONE ABSORPTION TOWER AND THAT OF TWO BOILERS WITH ONE TOWER IN DESULFURATION PROJECTS FOR 300 MW COAL-FIRED UNIT |
| |
| RONG Shuqun,SHAO Feng.COMPARISON BETWEEN SCHEME OF ONE BOILER WITH ONE ABSORPTION TOWER AND THAT OF TWO BOILERS WITH ONE TOWER IN DESULFURATION PROJECTS FOR 300 MW COAL-FIRED UNIT[J].Thermal Power Generation,2005,34(10):4-6. |
| |
| Authors: | RONG Shuqun SHAO Feng |
| |
| Abstract: | The operation and maintenance,as well as yard layout,capital investment,and operation cost of titlementioned schemes have been carried out.It is believed from analysis that the scheme of one boiler with one tower to have many advantages,even though its once forever investiment to be higher.However,the operation cost of it is lower than that of scheme for two boilers with one tower,and it can suit the increasingly strict requirements of environmental protection in the future. |
| |
| Keywords: | 300 MW coalfired unit desulfuration project absorption tower one boiler with one tower two boilers with one tower |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
