Fabrication of super‐ductile PP/LDPE blended parts with a chemical blowing agent |
| |
Authors: | Ying‐Guo Zhou Bei Su Lih‐Sheng Turng |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Materials and Forming, School of Material Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China;2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polymer Engineering Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison;3. Department of BIONATES, Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, 53715 |
| |
Abstract: | The mechanical blending of polypropylene (PP) and low density polyethylene (LDPE) is an economical and simple method for producing new polymeric materials for specific applications. However, the reduction in strain‐at‐break of the blend is one of its main shortcomings. In this study, PP/LDPE foamed parts were fabricated by conventional injection molding (CIM) with azodicarbonamide as a chemical blowing agent (CBA) and tested for tensile properties at two test speeds. Also, the fracture surfaces of the parts were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition, to investigate the underlying mechanism of the super‐ductility, the tested samples were carefully analyzed and compared, and further characterized by differential scanning calorimetry and SEM. The results suggest that fabricating PP/LDPE super‐ductile parts using CIM with a CBA is feasible. The results also indicate that there is a close relationship between the mechanical properties and morphological structures, which are deeply influenced by the dosage of CBA, the PP/LDPE ratio, and the packing parameters. Furthermore, compared to conventional injection molded solid parts, the ductility of the foamed parts can be dramatically improved by the formation of microfibrils in the PP phase, which come into being under certain processing conditions. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 44101. |
| |
Keywords: | foams injection molding properties and characterization structure‐property relations |
|
|