| 空间RC框架夹心节点与传统节点抗震性能对比试验 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘建伟,李英民,杨治洪,夏洪流,单亮. 空间RC框架夹心节点与传统节点抗震性能对比试验[J]. 工业建筑, 2009, 39(2): 88-93 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘建伟 李英民 杨治洪 夏洪流 单亮 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 重庆大学土木工程学院,重庆,400045;重庆市南岸区建委,重庆,400060;深圳奥亚娜工程顾问公司,广东,深圳,518001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为揭示钢筋混凝土框架夹心节点与传统节点抗震性能的差别,对空间中节点、空间端节点和空间角节点3组共6个试件进行对比试验,重点针对受力性能、变形性能、耗能性能以及梁筋粘结锚固性能进行对比分析。结果表明,夹心节点抗震性能稍劣于传统节点,但在保证抗剪承载力等性能的前提下用于工程实践是可行的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 框架节点 抗震性能 失效模式 抗剪承载力 梁筋粘结锚固性能 |
COMPARISON OF ASEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF TRADITIONAL AND SANDWICH SPACE RC BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS BASED ON CYCLIC LOAD TEST |
| |
| Liu Jianwei,Li Yingmin,Yang Zhihong,Xia Hongliu,Shan Liang. COMPARISON OF ASEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF TRADITIONAL AND SANDWICH SPACE RC BEAM-COLUMN JOINTS BASED ON CYCLIC LOAD TEST[J]. Industrial Construction, 2009, 39(2): 88-93 |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Jianwei Li Yingmin Yang Zhihong Xia Hongliu Shan Liang |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1.College of Civil Engineering;Chongqing University;Chongqing 400045;China;2.Nan'an District Construction Committee;Chongqing 400060;3.OveArup & Partners Shenzhen Office;Shenzhen 518001;China |
| |
| Abstract: | In order to know the difference between seismic resistant performance of reinforced concrete beam-column sandwich joints and traditional joints, six specimens of 3 sets,including interior joints,exterior joints and edge joints were tested and compared.Integrated results and behaviors consisting of load resistant capacity,ductility,energy dissipation capacity,beam bar anchorage were investigated.The comparison study showes the aseismic performance of the sandwich joints is not as good as that of traditional ... |
| |
| Keywords: | frame joints aseismic performance failure mode shear capacity beam bar anchorage |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
