Solve the problem first: Constructive solution strategies can influence the accuracy of retrospective confidence judgments. |
| |
Authors: | Mitchum, Ainsley L. Kelley, Colleen M. |
| |
Abstract: | Two experiments tested whether differences in problem-solving strategies influence the ability of people to monitor their problem-solving effectiveness as measured by confidence judgments. On multiple choice problems, people tend to use either a constructive matching strategy, whereby they attempt to solve a problem before looking at the response options, or a response elimination strategy, whereby they work backward from response options trying to find one that fits as a solution. Constructive matching gives rise to different cues that may enhance confidence monitoring. Experiment 1 showed that spontaneous constructive matching in nonverbal spatial reasoning problems was associated with better confidence calibration and resolution than response elimination. We manipulated strategy in Experiment 2 by requiring constructive matching and found improved monitoring. Implications for research on monitoring, overconfidence, and the association between skill and monitoring are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
| |
Keywords: | individual differences intelligence metacognition monitoring strategies problem-solving retrospective confidence judgments monitoring |
|
|