首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

复杂地表区基准面和静校正方法的选择
引用本文:刘治凡,毛海波,邵雨,李林. 复杂地表区基准面和静校正方法的选择[J]. 石油物探, 2003, 42(2): 240-247
作者姓名:刘治凡  毛海波  邵雨  李林
作者单位:新疆石油分公司勘探开发研究院地球物理研究所,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830011
摘    要:基于模型观测 ,用水平的和浮动的 4种基准面计算静校正值 ,分别用两步法和一步法作静校正 ,研究复杂地表结构条件下各种基准面和静校正方法的校正精度。试验结果表明 ,采用水平基准面两步法静校正 ,时间剖面反演深度误差最小 ;当基准面远离地表时 ,水平基准面一步法静校正也会产生较大的误差 ;非水平基准面两步法或一步法静校正 ,基准面的起伏越大 ,反演的深度误差越大 ,甚至出现构造假象

关 键 词:水平基准面  浮动基准面  两步法静校正  一步法静校正  静校正低频分量(RG)  静校正高频分量(RS)
文章编号:1000-1441(2003)02-0240-08
收稿时间:2002-04-01
修稿时间:2002-04-01

Adoption of datum planes and statics methods in complex surface areas
Liu Zhifan,Mao Haibo,Shao Yu,Li Lin. Adoption of datum planes and statics methods in complex surface areas[J]. Geophysical Prospecting For Petroleum, 2003, 42(2): 240-247
Authors:Liu Zhifan  Mao Haibo  Shao Yu  Li Lin
Affiliation:Geophysical institute, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Petroleum Exploration Company, Urumchi 830011, China
Abstract:The precision of different datum planes and statics methods was investigated on model measurements for complex subsurface. Statics quantity was calculated with horizontal and 4 floating datum planes and statics was carried out with two-pass and one-pass methods. The results were as follows. The horizontal datum and two-pass statics method gave minimum depth error on time section. As the datum goes away from the earth surface, the error generated by the horizontal datum and one-pass statics method increased. For non-horizontal datum two-pass statics method or one-pass static method, the depth error increased with the undulation of the datum, sometimes even leading to fake structures.
Keywords:horizontal datum  floating datum  two-pass statics  one-pass statics  low frequency component (R G) of statics  high frequency component (R S) of statics
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《石油物探》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《石油物探》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号