首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

旋流板和螺旋导叶气液分离性能对比研究
引用本文:独岩,孙国刚,祖泽辉.旋流板和螺旋导叶气液分离性能对比研究[J].石油化工设备,2022(2):11-15.
作者姓名:独岩  孙国刚  祖泽辉
作者单位:中国石油大学(北京)机械与储运工程学院
摘    要:通过建立轴流导叶式气液分离器试验系统,采用试验的方法,在相同气液操作工况下对比研究了旋流板和螺旋导叶式气液分离器的压降和分离效率.试验研究结果表明,在550~1220 m3/h的处理气量范围内,旋流板气相压降比螺旋导叶气相压降低13%~35%,能耗相对更低;在不同处理气量和液滴质量浓度下,旋流板分离效率比螺旋导叶分离效...

关 键 词:气液分离器  旋流板  螺旋导叶  分离性能  对比  研究

Comparative Study on the Performance of Gas-liquid Separation of Cyclone Plate and Spiral Guide Vane
DU Yan,SUN Guo-gang,ZU Ze-hui.Comparative Study on the Performance of Gas-liquid Separation of Cyclone Plate and Spiral Guide Vane[J].Petro-Chemical Equipment,2022(2):11-15.
Authors:DU Yan  SUN Guo-gang  ZU Ze-hui
Affiliation:(College of Mechanical and Storage Engineering,China University of Petroleum,Beijing 102249,China)
Abstract:The test system of axial flow guide vane gas-liquid separator was established,the pressure drop and separation efficiency of cyclone plate and spiral guide vane gas-liquid separator were compared by experiments under the same gas-liquid operational conditions.The results show that the pressure drop of the cyclone plate is 13%~35%lower than the spiral guide vane in the gas treating range of 550~1220 m3/h volume flow rate,which means the lower energy consumption.Under different volume flow rates and droplet concentrations,the separation efficiency of the cyclone plate is 2%~10%higher than that of the spiral guide vane and the operation elasticity is better.Within the range of the test conditions,the maximum efficiency air volume of the two guide vanes turns down first and then goes up with the increase of the inlet droplet concentration.The maximum efficiency droplet concentration of the cyclone plate goes up first and then turns down with the increase of the volume flow rate,while the spiral guide vane increases first and then stabilizes.
Keywords:gas-liquid separator  cyclone plate  spiral guide vane  separation performance  comparison  study
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号