Apparent digestibility of nutrients in diets with different energy density, as estimated by direct and marker methods for pigs with or without ileo-cecal cannulas

The objective of this study were a) to compare the apparent total tract digestibility (TD) between non-cannulated (intact) and cannulated (steered ileo-cecal valve technique, SICV) pigs fed diets differing in energy density (Exp. 1) and b) to compare the direct vs marker (Cr2O3) methods for estimation of the TD and apparent ileal digestibility (ID) in SICV-cannulated pigs (Exp. 2). In Exp. 1, 24 intact and 18 SICV-cannulated castrates of approximately 40 kg initial BW were randomly assigned to six treatments in a 2 x 3 x 2 factorial arrangement (two pig types, three carbohydrate sources, and two fat levels). In Exp. 2, the same SICV-cannulated pigs from Exp. 1 were given those treatments in a 2 x 3 x 2 factorial arrangement (two methods of digestibility estimation, three carbohydrates sources, and two fat levels). In both experiments either cornstarch, soybean hulls, or pure cellulose, without or with fat, were incorporated into a barely-soybean meal based diet to alter energy density. Daily diets were isoenergetic (based on NEf), and water supply was .33 L/MJ of NEf. In Exp. 1, the pig type effect on the TD of DM, OM, CP, and the pig type x carbohydrate interactions for the TD of DM, OM, and crude fiber (CF) were significant (P < .05), merely due to a larger difference found for the diet enriched with cellulose. In Exp. 2, the TD and ID evaluated with the marker method were significantly lower (except for the TD of CF) than with the direct method, mainly because Cr recovery was below 100%. Overall, the marker method seems to be superior because the TD means obtained from Cr ratios were closer to the TD obtained from intact pigs. In general, the SICV technique seems to be suitable for long-term digestibility studies to measure the TD and ID in the same pig fed low-or high-fiber diets.