Simultaneous conditioning in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Honeybees were classically conditioned with odor as conditioned stimulus/stimuli (CS), sucrose as unconditioned stimulus/stimuli (UCS), and proboscis extension as response. The purpose of Exp 1 (Ns?=?26 and 27) was to look for facilitation of forward conditioning by CS–UCS overlap, but rapid conditioning without overlap left little room for improvement. In 2 further experiments, CS and UCS were simultaneous, and response to odor alone was measured in subsequent tests. In Exp 2, a simultaneous group (N?=?25) responded more to the training odor than did an unpaired control group (N?=?25). In Exp 3, a differentially conditioned simultaneous group (N?=?29) responded more to an odor paired with sucrose in training (S+) than to an odor presented alone (S–). The implications of the results for the problem of the role of amount of reward in honeybee learning are considered. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)