Performance of alternative CFRP retrofitting schemes used in infilled RC frames |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Civil Engineering Faculty of Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey;2. Graduate School of Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey;3. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA, USA;4. Department of Civil Engineering, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey;5. Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Kultur University, Istanbul, Turkey;1. School of Engineering and Technology, Wellington Institute of Technology, Private Bag 39803, Lower Hutt 5045, New Zealand;2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates;1. School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Waihuan Xi Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou 510006, China;2. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Waihuan Xi Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou 510006, China |
| |
Abstract: | A number of experimental studies have been reported in recent literature about the beneficial effects of infill walls on the seismic response of reinforced concrete (RC) frames. The experimental study presented in this paper mainly focuses on the behavior of bare and carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFPR)-retrofitted infilled RC frames with different bracing configurations. Quasi-static experimental results are presented and discussed on six 1/3-scaled infilled RC frames that were retrofitted using CFRP material in various schemes. The test results showed a significant increase in the yield and ultimate strength capacities of the frames with a decrease in relative story drifts, especially in the cross-braced and the cross diamond-braced type of retrofitting schemes. The energy dissipation capacities of the retrofitted frames turned out to be more than those of the bare infilled frame, thus reducing the seismic demand imposed on the frames. The cross diamond-braced type of retrofitting scheme, which was positioned on the infill wall and outside the beam–column connection regions of RC frame, showed the best behavior among the other schemes. This scheme not only prevented brittle shear failures of the infill wall, but also prevented the transfer of additional forces to the weak and brittle beam–column connections. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|