Intrahelical side chain-side chain contacts: the consequences of restricted rotameric states and implications for helix engineering and design

Intrahelical side chain–side chain (sc–sc) interactionsare assumed to play a crucial role in the formation and stabilityof -helices, yet it was found that only 37.2% of all helicalresidues are involved in such close contacts, assuming a specificminimum contact distance. The majority (58.0%) of these weredetected between residues with amino acid sequence spacing i,i + 4. The low frequency of intrahelical sc–sc contactswith sequence separations i, i + 1 and ii, i + 3, each observedwith only about one-third of the i, i + 4 counts, can be directlyand generally attributed to the absence of the g^- conformationin helices for the dihedral angle X₁- However, if it was assumedthat each side chain may maximally make only one sc–sccontact, as most commonly observed, the percentage of contactingpairs increased relative to the maximum possible pairs for agiven sequence spacing by a factor of {small tilde}4, e.g. from20.9 to 81.7% for i, i + 4 contacts. Stereochemical reasonsare also given for the observation that i, i + 3 contacts arecomposed largely of ion or polar pairs, while hydrophobic residuesdominate the i, i + 4 contacts. No significantly increased densityof intrahelical sc–sc contacts with increasing helix lengthwas found. Although there were generally fewer intrahelicalcontacts between buried helical residues when more contactswere made to the tertiary protein environment, the number ofintrahelical contacts did not increase with increasing solventexposure of the helices. Implications for helix design and thepacking of helices are discussed.