High-yield expression, purification, and characterization of active, soluble Bacteroides fragilis metallo-beta-lactamase, CcrA

Two new areas of anchor development are biodegradable anchors and "mini" anchors. The group of biodegradable anchors tested include the Bio-Anchor, LactoSorb, Biofix, Bio-Statak, Mini Screw suture anchor, DePuy 4.5 molded, DePuy 4.5 machined, DePuy 3.5 machined, TAG Wedge 4, TAG Rod 2, TAG Wedge 3, TAG Wedge 2, and Stealth. "Mini anchors" have drill holes or minor diameters of < 2.2 mm. Those tested include the Mini Revo and Bio-Anchor, miniHarpoon, mini Mitek and Fast in 3, Statak 1.5 and 2.5, SB 2 and PeBA 3, Corkscrew 5, Corkscrew 3.5, and Fastak A2, Ogden 2.5, TAG Wedge 2, ROC 1.9, and Questus 2.5. Additional anchors tested that fit neither category include the Anspach, Questus 3.5 and 5.0, SB 3 and PeBA-C, Ogden 3.5, Fast in 4, Ultrafix, and the ROC 3.5, ROC 2.8, ROC 2.3, and ROC XS. An anchor comparison, using an established protocol in fresh porcine femurs, recorded failure strength, failure mode, eyelet size, minor and major diameters, and drill hole sizes. Except for the Bio-Anchor and TAG Wedge 2, biodegradable anchors tend to be larger to compensate for their lower strength relative to metal. Biodegradable screw anchors' predominant failure mode was eyelet cutout, whereas biodegradable nonscrew anchors failed to predominantly by anchor pullout. From an initial mechanical perspective, these biodegradable anchors perform acceptably. Both biodegradable and "mini" anchors include screw and nonscrew designs. As expected, screw designs perform well and generally fail at higher loads than nonscrew anchors. Although biodegradable anchors, as a group, are not as strong as metal anchors, they are stronger than the sutures for which they are designed. The move to smaller ("mini") and biodegradable anchors is supported by these data. Whether an anchor fails at twice the suture breaking strength or 10 times the suture breaking strength should make no difference.