Problems in the Extraction of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Diesel Particulate Matter

In this work, a comparison between Soxhlet, ultrasonic, and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) (using hexane:acetone 1:1) of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from SRM 1650 diesel particulate matter was made. As good recoveries were not obtained for the higher molecular weight compounds, MAE with toluene and dichloromethane was also tested. Achieved recoveries were compared with the results obtained in the same assays made with SRM 1648 urban particulate matter and real atmospheric particulate samples. In order to explain the difficulty of the extraction of PAHs from SRM 1650 in comparison to SRM 1648 and real atmospheric particulate samples, elemental analysis, X-ray diffraction, and particle analysis using scanning electron microscopy coupled to an automatic computer imaging system were also made. It is important to notice that SRM 1650 shows a high percentage of carbon and differences in the morphology of the particles between SRM 1650 and SRM 1648 were observed.