首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Intercomparison of the Realization of the ITS-90 at the Freezing Points of Al and Ag among European NMIs
Authors:D. Heyer  U. Noatsch  E. Tegeler  M. Anagnostou  E. Turzo-Andras  I. Antonsen  V. Augevicius  J. Bojkovski  A. Bronnum  V. Chimenti  S. Duris  E. Filipe  S. Gaita  J. Gray  D. Head  E. Grudniewicz  J. Ivarsson  M. Kalemci  O. Kerkhof  I. Lobo  S. Nemeth  A. Pokhodun  J. Ranostaj  E. Renaot  P. Rosenkranz  M. Smid  P. Steur  A. Steiner  M. Valin  T. Veliki  T. Weckström
Affiliation:1. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Abbestr. 2-12, 10587, Berlin, Germany
2. Hellenic Institute of Metrology (EIM), Thessaloniki, Greece
3. National Office of Measures (OMH), Budapest, Hungary
4. National Standards Laboratory (Justervesenet), Kjeller, Norway
5. Temperature Standard Laboratory (VMT/PFI), Vilnius, Lithuania
6. Laboratory of Metrology and Quality (MIRS/FE-LMK), Ljubljana, Slovenia
7. Teknologisk Institut, Aarhus, Denmark
8. Centro Espanol de Metrologia (CEM), Madrid, Spain
9. Slovak Institute of Metrology (SMU), Bratislava, Slovakia
10. Instituto Português da Qualidade (IPQ), Caparica, Portugal
11. Institut National de Metrologie (INM), Bucarest, Romania
12. National Physical Laboratory (NPL), Teddington, UK
13. Central Office of Measures (GUM), Warsaw, Poland
14. Swedish National Testing and Research Institute (SP), Bor?s, Sweden
15. Ulusal Metroloji Enstitsu (UME), Besevler, Gebze, Turkey
16. National Metrology Institute (NMi), Delft, The Netherlands
17. D.I. Mendeleyev Institute of Metrology, St. Petersburg, Russia
18. Institut National de Metrologie (LNE – INM/CNAM), Paris, France
19. Bundesamt f?r Eich- und Vermessungswesen, Wien, Austria
20. Czech Metrology Institute (CMI), Praha, Czech Republic
21. Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRiM), (formerly Istituto di Metrologia (CNR)), Torino, Italy
22. Federal Office of Metrology (METAS), Bern, Switzerland
23. University of Zagreb (FSB-LPM), Zagreb, Croatia
24. Centre for Metrology and Accreditation (Mikes), Helsinki, Finland
Abstract:The EUROMET.T-K4 comparison is the regional extension of CCT-K4, an intercomparison of the realizations of the freezing points of Al (660.323°C) and Ag (961.78°C). The intercomparison was organized in four loops. Long-stem standard platinum resistance thermometers (SPRTs) were used as traveling standards: 25 Ω thermometers to be used only at the Al freezing point and two high-temperature standard platinum resistance thermometers (HTSPRTs) to be used only at the Ag freezing point in each loop. Parallel to the measurements with thermometers, the pilots and sub-pilots organized an internal intercomparison using an Ag fixed-point cell. Most HTSPRTs showed a strong drift which is mainly due to mechanical stress and poisoning of the sensor by impurities. This drift can be partially compensated by a correction based on Matthiessen’s rule. An evaluation of the data taking into account both HTSPRTs in each loop, the linkage of the sub-pilots by measurements at the Ag freezing point, and a possible compensation according to Matthiessens’s rule, allows calculation of the results of the participants’ measurements at the Ag freezing point. The results of the participating laboratories are summarized, and proposals for key comparison reference values and linking of the results to CCT-K3 and CCT-K4 are presented.
Keywords:Al freezing point  Ag freezing point  CCT  EUROMET  Fixed points  High-temperature standard platinum resistance thermometers  Key comparison  Matthiessen’  s rule
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号