首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Global ESRD Costs Associated with a Short Daily Hemodialysis Program in the United States
Authors:George Ting  Brian Carrie  Terri Freitas  Shahrzad Zarghamee
Abstract:In spite of the growing evidence that daily hemodialysis (DHD) improves clinical outcomes and quality of life, the additional dialysis costs are not currently reimbursed in the United States. Nor have there been reports of the effects of DHD on end-stage renal disease (ESRD) global costs, which would help predict the financial impact of DHD on the ESRD program. Since 1996, 22 patients (20 in-center, 2 home) have switched from conventional thrice-weekly dialysis to short, daily dialysis with six treatments per week. Eighteen patients started for medical indications, and four started for nonmedical reasons. Causes of ESRD were the following: diabetes mellitus (6), hypertension (4), glomerulonephritis (6), hereditary (2), and other (4). Mean age was 56 ± 16 years. Patients had an average of 3.3 major comorbidities. Weekly conventional HD dialysis times were divided into six DHD treatments, each 2.0 ± 0.3 hours. Weekly Kt/V remained unchanged. Twenty-two patients were followed on DHD for 220 patient-months: 7 patients died after 1.8 ± 1.3 months, 2 were transplanted at 4.3 ± 3.2 months, and 2 discontinued DHD at 3.6 ± 4.8 months. Eleven patients remain on DHD at 17.4 ± 8.3 months. Actual costs per extra dialysis session are as follows: $14.30 for supplies and $3.20 for labor for setup/cleanup time (15 minutes at $12.80/hour). Annualized DHD savings are based on comparison of doses of epoetin alpha (Epogen) and blood pressure medication at the start and after 12 months of DHD. Hospitalization rates include all enrolled patients, comparing rates for the 12 months prior to DHD with the first year on DHD, or annualized rates for those on DHD less than one year. Cost assumptions are $9/ 1000 U Epogen, $1/blood pressure pill, and $1200/per day of hospitalization. Extra transportation costs were covered by the patients. No increased access problems were observed. For patients on short DHD longer than 12 months, supply and labor costs increased to $2733/patient/year; however, Epogen use was reduced 55%, and blood pressure medications were reduced 40%. For all patients who switched to DHD, hospitalization rates were reduced 24%. This resulted in a net savings of about $4241/patient/ year after 12 months on DHD. Overall ESRD costs were substantially decreased on DHD. These cost savings must be passed on to providers before DHD becomes more widely available.
Keywords:Daily hemodialysis  global costs  capitation  ESRD  erythropoietin  hospitalization
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号