Deformation Induced Martensite Formation and its Effect on Transformation Induced Plasticity (TRIP)

The knowledge of the stress‐ and deformation‐induced martensite formation in metastable austenitic steels including the formation temperatures and amounts formed is of considerable importance for the understanding of the transformation induced plasticity. For this purpose a stress‐temperature‐transformation (STT) and a deformation‐temperature‐transformation (DTT) diagram have been developed for the steel X5CrNi 18 10 (1.4301, AISI 304). It is shown that the M_d‐temperature for γ→?, ?→α', γ→?→α’ and γ→α’ martensite formation is defined by two stress‐temperature curves which show a different temperature dependence. They specify the beginning and the end of the deformation‐induced martensite formation in the range of uniform elongation. The intersection point defines the corresponding M_d‐temperature. The stress difference which results from the stresses for the end and the beginning of the martensite formation shows positive values below the M_d‐temperature. It defines the amount of martensite being formed. When the M_d^γ→? temperature is reached and the formation of the first deformation‐induced amount of ?‐martensite appears, an anomalous temperature dependence of the maximum uniform elongation starts. The highest values of the maximum uniform elongation are registered for the tested steel in the immediate vicinity of the M_d^γ→α' or the M_d^γ→?→α' temperature ‐ similar as in other metastable austenitic CrNi steels. At this temperature the highest amount of deformation‐induced ?‐phase exists. The transformation plasticity in the test steel is considerably caused by the deformation‐induced ? and α’ martensite formation. Using the new evaluation method, the increase of plasticity ΔA (TRIP‐effect) and strength ΔR can be quantified.