Commentary training improves responsiveness to hazards in a driving simulator |
| |
Authors: | David Crundall Ben Andrews Editha van Loon Peter Chapman |
| |
Affiliation: | Accident Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Can commentary driving produce safer drivers? Producing a verbal commentary of potential hazards during driving has long been considered by the police to improve hazard perception skills. In this study we investigated whether learner drivers would benefit from being trained to produce a commentary drive. All learners were initially assessed on a virtual route in a driving simulator that contained 9 hazards. One group of drivers was then trained in commentary driving, and their subsequent simulated driving behaviour was compared to a control group. The results showed that the trained group had fewer crashes, reduced their speed sooner on approach to hazards, and applied pressure to the brakes sooner than untrained drivers. Conversely the untrained drivers’ behaviour on approach to hazards was symptomatic of being surprised at the appearance of the hazards. The benefit of training was found to be greater for certain types of hazard than others. |
| |
Keywords: | Commentary driving Training Hazard perception Driving simulator |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |