首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于虚拟磁链的PWM整流器模型预测直接功率控制
引用本文:罗德荣,周小艳,姬小豪,荣飞,何仁浩. 基于虚拟磁链的PWM整流器模型预测直接功率控制[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2017, 37(12)
作者姓名:罗德荣  周小艳  姬小豪  荣飞  何仁浩
作者单位:湖南大学 电气与信息工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082,湖南大学 电气与信息工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082,国网江苏省电力公司检修分公司,江苏 苏州 215000,湖南大学 电气与信息工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082,湖南大学 电气与信息工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51577052)
摘    要:为了省去基于虚拟磁链定向的传统直接功率控制(DPC)中的滞环比较器和开关表以及基于电压定向的传统模型预测直接功率控制(MPDPC)中的交流电压传感器,提高系统的动态响应,实现功率的准确跟踪,在二者的基础上结合空间矢量脉宽调制(SVPWM),再引入延时补偿和重复控制,在两相静止坐标系下,以电网电压作为基本控制矢量,利用功率给定值与实测值的误差平方和最小建立目标函数,提出一种基于虚拟磁链的电压型PWM整流器的改进MPDPC方法。将传统DPC、传统MPDPC与改进MPDPC进行了仿真和实验对比研究。仿真和实验结果表明,所提改进MPDPC方法提高了功率跟踪精度,减小了功率纹波,降低了电流谐波畸变率。

关 键 词:PWM整流器;模型预测直接功率控制;虚拟磁链;空间矢量脉宽调制;重复控制;延时补偿
收稿时间:2017-03-01
修稿时间:2017-10-03

Virtual-flux-based model predictive direct power control for PWM rectifiers
LUO Derong,ZHOU Xiaoyan,JI Xiaohao,RONG Fei and HE Renhao. Virtual-flux-based model predictive direct power control for PWM rectifiers[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2017, 37(12)
Authors:LUO Derong  ZHOU Xiaoyan  JI Xiaohao  RONG Fei  HE Renhao
Affiliation:College of Electrical and Information Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China,College of Electrical and Information Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China,State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Maintenance Branch Company, Suzhou 215000, China,College of Electrical and Information Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China and College of Electrical and Information Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
Abstract:To leave out the hysteresis controller and switching look-up table used in virtual flux oriented traditional DPC(Direct Power Control) and the AC voltage sensors in traditional MPDPC(Model Predictive Direct Power Control),improve dynamic response of control system, and achieve accurate power tracking, the delay compensation and repetitive control are integrated with SVPWM(Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation) to propose an improved MPDPC method for voltage-source PWM rectifier based on virtual flux that are also based on traditional DPC and traditional MPDPC method, which takes the grid voltage as the basic control vector and the sum of squared error between predictive power and measured power model minimization as the objective function in two-phase stationary frame. The traditional DPC, traditional MPDPC and improved MPDPC are compared by simulation and experiment, and the results show that the improved MPDPC method improves the accuracy of power tracking and reduces the power ripple and the harmonic distortion rate of current.
Keywords:PWM rectifier   MPDPC   virtual flux   SVPWM   repetitive control   delay compensation
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《电力自动化设备》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《电力自动化设备》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号