Affiliation: | 1.Department of Clinical Pharmacy,Dongguan Third People’s Hospital, Affiliated Dongguan Shilong People’s Hospital of Southern Medical University,Dongguan,China;2.Department of Gynaecology and Obstetric,Dongguan Third People’s Hospital, Affiliated Dongguan Shilong People’s Hospital of Southern Medical University,Dongguan,China;3.Department of Pharmacy,Guangdong Province Agricultural Reclamation Central Hospital,Zhanjiang,China;4.School of Pharmacy, Guangdong Medical University,Dongguan,China |
Abstract: | BackgroundThe potential glucose-lowering effects of pomegranate have been reported in animal and observational studies, but intervention studies in humans have generated mixed results. In this paper, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the precise effects of pomegranate supplementation on measures of glucose control, insulin levels and insulin sensitivity in humans.MethodsComprehensive electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies included were RCTs that evaluated the changes in diabetes biomarkers among adults (≥18 years) following pomegranate interventions. The predefined outcomes included fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting blood insulin (FBI), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Endpoints were calculated as weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using a random-effects model. Publication bias, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analysis and random-effects meta-regression were also performed to explore the influence of covariates on the net changes in fasting glucose and insulin concentrations.ResultsSixteen eligible trials with 538 subjects were included. The pooled estimates suggested that pomegranate did not significantly affect the measures of FBG (WMD, ?0.6 mg/dL; 95% CI, ?2.79 to 1.58; P=0.59), FBI (WMD, 0.29 μIU/mL; 95% CI, ?1.16 to 1.75; P=0.70), HOMA-IR (WMD, ?0.04; 95% CI, ?0.53 to 0.46; P=0.88) or HbA1c (WMD, ?0.11%; 95% CI, ?0.39 to ?0.18; P=0.46). Overall, significant heterogeneity was detected for FBI and HOMA-IR, but subgroup analysis could not identify factors significantly influencing these parameters. These results were robust in sensitivity analysis, and no significant publication bias was found in the current meta-analysis.ConclusionPomegranate intake did not show a notably favourable effect on improvements in glucose and insulin metabolism. The current evidence suggests that daily pomegranate supplementation is not recommended as a potential therapeutic strategy in glycemic management. Further large-scale RCTs with longer duration are required to confirm these results. |