| 两种四溢流塔盘设计方法的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙兰义,陈亮,李军,刘雪暖,李青松.两种四溢流塔盘设计方法的比较[J].炼油技术与工程,2008,38(10). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙兰义 陈亮 李军 刘雪暖 李青松 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国石油大学化学化工学院,山东省青岛市,266555 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部博士点基金新教师项目资助课题(20070425530)。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 介绍四溢流塔盘设计中等通道长度法和等鼓泡面积法对应的降液管面积分配和位置、出口堰及降液管底隙设计。给出了两种方法详细的计算过程,并进行了总结比较。通过实例计算,结果表明等通道长度法优于等鼓泡面积法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 四溢流塔盘 设计 等通道长度法 等鼓泡面积法 |
COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR FOUR-PASS DESIGN |
| |
| Sun Lanyi,Chen Liang,Li Jun,Liu Xuenuan,Li Qingsong.COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR FOUR-PASS DESIGN[J].Petroleum Refinery Engineering,2008,38(10). |
| |
| Authors: | Sun Lanyi Chen Liang Li Jun Liu Xuenuan Li Qingsong |
| |
| Affiliation: | Qingdao 266555;Shandong;China |
| |
| Abstract: | There are two main kinds of four-pass trays design methods i.e.equal flow-path length method and equal bubbling area method.The design of area distribution and location of downcomer,outlet weir and bottom spacing of downcomer corresponding to the two methods are described,and the detailed calculation processes are proposed and compared.A case study shows that the equal flow path length method is better than equal bubbling area method. |
| |
| Keywords: | four-pass trays design equal flow-path length method equal bubbling area method |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
