| Abstract: | Cognitive therapy and experiential dynamic therapy show quite many similarities but they diverge in their initial approach to the patient (aiming respectively at cognitions and at emotions) and in their assumptions about core pathogenetic processes. According to cognitive therapy patients suffer because of a negative unrealistic inner representation of self and world, whereas for experiential dynamic therapy problems arise from conflictual experience and expression of healthy feelings and needs. A synthetic model of the pathogenetic core process, embracing both a conflict about healthy needs and emotions, and a negative self-image, is outlined and discussed. In particular, the model's congruence with new knowledge emerging from infant and attachment research, emotion theory, and cognitive neurosciences is illustrated. Assuming an identity of their basic pathogenetic theory, the two therapies can be thought of as two initially different approaches, the one focusing more on cognitions, the other on emotions, but converging toward the change of a common pathogenetic core. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
