首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

地浸采铀工艺分类方法的探讨
引用本文:周义朋,沈照理,史维浚,孙占学,刘金辉,刘亚洁. 地浸采铀工艺分类方法的探讨[J]. 有色金属(冶炼部分), 2015, 0(1): 37-41
作者姓名:周义朋  沈照理  史维浚  孙占学  刘金辉  刘亚洁
作者单位:1. 中国地质大学,北京100083;东华理工大学,南昌330013
2. 中国地质大学,北京,100083
3. 东华理工大学,南昌,330013
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(40872165);国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2012CB723101)
摘    要:随着地浸技术的发展,一些新工艺很难简单地用传统的酸、碱分类方法进行界定,出现工艺归类与地浸实际工作状态不一致的现象,也造成了技术交流的不便。在综述目前主要地浸工艺及其铀迁移原理的基础上,对地浸采铀工艺分类方法进行了探讨,提出了分别以地浸工作液pH和浸出铀的迁移形式为依据的分类方法。

关 键 词:地浸采铀  工艺分类  酸法地浸  碱法地浸  中性地浸
收稿时间:2014-09-07
修稿时间:2014-09-07

Discussion on Technology Classification of In-situ Leaching Uranium Mining
ZHOU Yipeng,SHEN Zhaoli,SHI Weijun,SUN Zhanxue,LIU Jinhui and LIU Yajie. Discussion on Technology Classification of In-situ Leaching Uranium Mining[J]. Nonferrous Metals(Extractive Metallurgy), 2015, 0(1): 37-41
Authors:ZHOU Yipeng  SHEN Zhaoli  SHI Weijun  SUN Zhanxue  LIU Jinhui  LIU Yajie
Affiliation:East China Institute of Technology,,,,,
Abstract:With development of technology of in-situ leaching uranium mining, it is difficult to define some new techniques by traditional classification methods by which the in-situ leaching techniques are grouped into acid leaching and alkaline leaching. Confusion and inconvenience occur during technological and academic exchanges due to inconsistencies between classification and actual in-situ leaching conditions. Based on the review of main techniques of in-situ leaching and uranium migration theory, the classification methods of in-situ leaching uranium mining technique were discussed, and improved classification methods were proposed based on pH value of leaching solution and migration form of dissolved uranium respectively.
Keywords:in-situ leaching uranium mining   technology classification   acid in-situ leaching   alkaline in-situ leaching   neutral in-situ leaching
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《有色金属(冶炼部分)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《有色金属(冶炼部分)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号