首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

无黏性有限土体主动破坏及土压力离散元分析
引用本文:万励,张兴周,王宇峰,徐立明,徐长节.无黏性有限土体主动破坏及土压力离散元分析[J].土木与环境工程学报,2019,41(3):19-26.
作者姓名:万励  张兴周  王宇峰  徐立明  徐长节
作者单位:浙江大学 滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心;浙江省城市地下空间开发工程技术研究中心, 杭州 310058,浙江交工集团股份有限公司, 杭州 310000,浙江交工集团股份有限公司, 杭州 310000,浙江杭海城际铁路有限公司, 浙江 嘉兴 314000,浙江大学 滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心;浙江省城市地下空间开发工程技术研究中心, 杭州 310058;华东交通大学 土木建筑学院;江西省岩土工程基础设施安全与控制重点实验室, 南昌 330013
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(2015CB057801);国家自然科学基金(51878276);国家杰出青年科学基金(51725802)
摘    要:建立在半无限土体假定上的朗肯土压力理论和库伦土压力理论,在挡土墙后填土有限的情况下不再适用。针对墙后无黏性填土,采用离散元方法分别对光滑、粗糙墙面平动模式下墙后有限宽度土体主动破坏的过程进行研究,分析了挡土墙运动过程中滑裂带发展、土体位移规律以及墙后水平土压力分布的情况。研究结果表明,墙体光滑情况下,滑裂带呈直线,墙后填土宽高比较小时,可以观察到滑裂带的反射,墙后土体呈多折线破坏模式,滑裂带倾角基本与库伦理论滑裂带倾角相等,且与土体宽高比无关,水平土压力合力受土体宽高比影响亦不大。墙体粗糙情况下,滑裂带呈曲线,反射现象随墙体粗糙程度增加而减弱,滑裂带倾角随土体宽高比增大而减小,最终落于库伦理论滑裂带内侧。此时,存在一临界宽高比,当墙后土体宽高比小于此值时,主动土压力随宽高比增大而增大,大于此值时,主动土压力不受宽高比影响。而无论墙体粗糙与否,墙后土体宽高比越小,达到极限状态所需墙体位移均越小。

关 键 词:挡土墙  有限土体  土压力  主动破坏  离散元
收稿时间:2018/11/7 0:00:00

DEM study on active failure and earth pressure of cohesionless soil with limited width behind retaining wall
Wan Li,Zhang Xingzhou,Wang Yufeng,Xu Liming and Xu Changjie.DEM study on active failure and earth pressure of cohesionless soil with limited width behind retaining wall[J].Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering,2019,41(3):19-26.
Authors:Wan Li  Zhang Xingzhou  Wang Yufeng  Xu Liming and Xu Changjie
Affiliation:Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering;Engineering Research Center of Urban Underground Development of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, P. R. China,Zhejiang Communications Construction Group Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 310000, P. R. China,Zhejiang Communications Construction Group Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 310000, P. R. China,Zhejiang Hanghai Intercity Railway Co., Ltd, Jiaxing 314000, Zhe jiang, P. R. China and Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering;Engineering Research Center of Urban Underground Development of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, P. R. China;School of Civil Engineering and Architecture;Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Infrastructure Safety Control in Geotechnical Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, P. R. China
Abstract:The classical Coulomb and Rankine earth pressure theories are based on the assumption that the soil near a retaining wall are semi-infinite. It is obvious that these theories are no longer suitable for the narrow backfill behind a retaining wall. A series of numerical simulations are conducted by DEM to study the active failure process of limited cohesionless soil with finite width behind a rough and smooth walls. The development of the failure surface, the displacement field of the soils and the distribution of active earth pressure are analyzed. The results show that multiple slip surfaces occur in the backfill if the region behind the smooth wall is narrow enough. The slip surface angle is close to the Coulomb''s theoretical solution, which shows no relation with the width height ratio. This ratio also has little influence on the active earth pressure in this case. In another case, when the wall is rough, the actual shape of failure surface is a curve rather than a straight line. The rougher the wall, the weaker the reflection. The angle of failure surface decreases along with the width height ratio of soils increases. And the failure surface is finally located inside the Coulomb''s failure surface. There exists a critical width height ratio of soils behind the rough wall. The active earth pressure decreases with increases of the ratio if it is smaller than the critical value, but the active earth pressure is independent from the ratio if it is larger than the critical ratio. The smaller the width height ratio is, the smaller displacement of the ultimate equilibrium state will be, regardless of roughness of the retaining wall.
Keywords:retaining wall  limited soils  earth pressure  active failure  DEM
点击此处可从《土木与环境工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《土木与环境工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号