首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

瓦斯损失量计算方法的比较分析
引用本文:李迎春,杨胜强. 瓦斯损失量计算方法的比较分析[J]. 煤矿安全, 2012, 43(9): 166-168
作者姓名:李迎春  杨胜强
作者单位:煤炭资源与安全开采国家重点实验室,江苏徐州221008 中国矿业大学安全工程学院,江苏徐州221008
基金项目:国家自然科学基金重点资助项目,国际科技合作项目
摘    要:用直接法测定煤层瓦斯含量时,最难控制、误差也最大的就是瓦斯损失量的计算。目前,图解法和最小二乘法是计算瓦斯损失量最为常用的方法,采用这2种方法对煤层瓦斯含量测定过程中的瓦斯损失量进行了计算,并进行了比较分析,然后在统计实测数据的基础上分析比较这2种方法对瓦斯损失量测定准确度的影响。

关 键 词:图解法  最小二乘法  瓦斯损失量  直接法  瓦斯含量测定

The Comparative Analysis of Gas Loss Quantity Calculation Method
LI Ying-chun,YANG Sheng-qiang. The Comparative Analysis of Gas Loss Quantity Calculation Method[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2012, 43(9): 166-168
Authors:LI Ying-chun  YANG Sheng-qiang
Affiliation:1,2(1.State Key Laboratory of Coal Resource and Safety Mining,Xuzhou 221008,China;2.School of Safety Engineering,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221008,China)
Abstract:When using the direct method to measure the gas content in coal seam,the most difficult to control and the largest error is gas loss quantity calculation.At present,using the graphic method and the least squares method to calculate the loss quantity of gas are the most commonly method.In this paper,two methods were used to calculate the gas loss quantity in measuring coal seam gas content,and the results were compared and analyzed.Then on the basis of statistical measured data,the influence of the two methods on the accuracy of gas loss quantity was analyzed and compared.
Keywords:graphic method  least squares method  gas loss quantity  direct method  gas content measurement
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号