首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Evaluation of methods for verifying the performance of color‐measuring instruments. Part II: Inter‐instrument reproducibility
Authors:David R. Wyble  Danny C. Rich
Affiliation:1. Munsell Color Science Laboratory, Rochester Institute of Technology, 54 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623;2. Color Research Laboratory, Sun Chemical Corporation, 631 Central Avenue, Carlstadt, NJ 07072
Abstract:Part I described an experiment in which the repeatability of a number of common, commercially available spectrocolorimeters was compared using ASTM procedures. ASTM E2214‐02 Standard Practice for Specifying and Verifying the Performance of Color‐Measuring Instruments is intended to standardize the terminology and procedures used to evaluate color measuring instruments. In this article, we develop reproducibility results from a medium‐term study of 10 commercial spectrocolorimeters. The comparisons are presented so as to contrast between the traditional color difference based specifications found in the historical literature and in manufacturer's literature and the more complex multidimensional methods specified in E2214. Instrument to instrument contrasts are reported as well as tests of agreement across a set of instruments as a whole. The results confirm common understandings. Hemispherical diffuse instruments exhibit a higher level of inter‐instrument agreement than do bidirectional (45:0) instruments. The results also provide support for a surprising conclusion about the statistical significance of the minor differences in both inter‐instrument agreement and inter‐model agreement for a single manufacturer. Some speculations on the impact of these conclusions to the development of future comparisons of spectrocolorimeters are given. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 32, 176–294, 2007
Keywords:color measurement  color tolerances  instrumentation
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号