首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Indoor environmental quality differences between office types in LEED-certified buildings in the US
Authors:Young S. Lee  Denise A. Guerin
Affiliation:1. School of Planning, Design, and Construction, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA;2. College of Design, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN 55108, USA
Abstract:The study compared IAQ, thermal quality, and lighting quality between 5 different office types in LEED-certified buildings in relation to employees' environmental satisfaction and their job performance. This was to provide workplaces where workers in each specific office environment could be provided with appropriate office settings regarding these IEQ criteria when organizations comply with LEED standards. The five types of office included private enclosed, private shared, open-plan with high cubicle over 5′, open-plan with low cubicle lower than 5′, and open-plan with no partitions (bullpen) offices. The study found IAQ enhanced workers' job performance in enclosed private offices more than both high cubicles and low cubicles. All four office types had higher satisfaction with the amount of light and visual comfort of light as well as more enhancement with job performance due to lighting quality than high cubicles. There was no difference in thermal quality between the five office types. IAQ and lighting quality were not different between enclosed private, enclosed shared, and bullpen office types, either. The study findings suggest a careful workplace design considering the height of partitions in LEED-certified buildings to improve employee's environmental satisfaction and job performance.
Keywords:Indoor air quality   Thermal quality   Lighting quality   Occupant satisfaction and performance   Office types   LEED-certified buildings
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号