Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of polyamide 6 and ethylene‐co‐butyl acrylate blends

The nonisothermal melt‐crystallization behavior of PA6 and EBA blends at varying EBA content was investigated using differential scanning calorimetry at different scanning rates. Several macrokinetic models such as Avrami, Jeziorny, Ozawa, Liu, Ziabicki, and Tobin were applied to analyze the crystallization behavior thoroughly under nonisothermal conditions. The Avrami and Tobin model predicted that, for pure PA6 and PA6/EBA blends, simultaneous growth of all forms of crystal structures such as fibrillar, disc‐like, and spherulitic proceeds at an increasing nucleation rate. However, when applied to blends for isothermal crystallization, the Avrami model predicted that the crystallization process is diffusion‐controlled for pure PA6 and PA6/EBA blend containing higher content of EBA (50 phr), where the nylon‐6 chains were able to diffuse freely to crystallize under isothermal conditions. Liu model predicted that, at unit crystallization time, a higher cooling rate should be used to obtain a higher degree of crystallinity for both PA6 and PA6/EBA blends. The kinetic crystallizability of PA6 in the blends calculated using Ziabicki's approach varies depending upon the nucleation density and PA6‐rich regions present in the blend compositions. Nucleation activity of the blends estimated by Dobreva and Gutzowa method reveals that the EBA particles are inert at lower concentrations of EBA and do not act as nucleating agent for PA6 molecules in the blends. The activation energy of nonisothermal crystallization, calculated using Augis–Bennett, Kissinger, and Takhor methods indicated that the activation energy is slightly lower for the blends when compared to the neat PA6. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008