首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

压实黄土平面应变方向的主应力特性
引用本文:陈存礼,贾亚军,王俊甫,赵杰,张洋. 压实黄土平面应变方向的主应力特性[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(Z1): 16-21. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S1003
作者姓名:陈存礼  贾亚军  王俊甫  赵杰  张洋
作者单位:1. 西安理工大学岩土工程研究所,陕西 西安 710048;2. 西安理工大学陕西省黄土力学与工程重点实验室,陕西 西安 710048;3. 中广核工程有限公司,广东 深圳 518124
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(50878183); 陕西省教育厅省级重点实验室重点科研项目(14JS063)
摘    要:对不同含水率压实黄土进行等小主动主应力σ_x的平面应变三轴试验,研究了含水率w及小主动主应力σ_x对加载过程中平面应变方向主应力σ_y特性的影响,根据试验结果提出了描述平面应变方向与其它方向主应力双线性关系的表达式,验证了基于典型强度准则的中主应力公式描述压实黄土σ_y变化的适用性。研究结果表明:在等向固结及初始加载阶段,平面应变方向主应力不是中主应力σ_2,而是小主应力σ_3;平面应变方向主应力比σ_y/σ_x随着主动主应力比R的增大先平缓后快速增大,转折点前后主应力之间分别呈线性和非线性关系;转折点处的主动主应力比Rz大于平面应变方向主应力由小主应力转变为中主应力临界点处的主动主应力比Rc,w及σ_x对Rz的影响较大,对Rc的影响很小。R较小时,w及σ_x对加载过程中σ_y/σ_x几乎没有影响。主应力参数K(=2σ_y/(σ_x+σ_z))与主动主应力比R之间呈双直线;前段为水平直线,K近似为常数Kc;后段为倾斜向上的直线;Kc及直线斜率m与w及σ_x的大小无关。提出的双线性函数能较好地预测压实黄土加载过程中σ_y的变化特性,而仅在土样破坏时,基于Lade-Duncan及SMP准则的中主应力公式的预测值与试验值比较接近。

关 键 词:压实黄土  含水率  小主动主应力  平面应变方向主应力  模型  
收稿时间:2017-06-11

Characteristics of principal stress of compacted loess in plane strain direction
CHEN Cun-li,JIA Ya-jun,WANG Jun-fu,ZHAO Jie,ZHANG Yang. Characteristics of principal stress of compacted loess in plane strain direction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(Z1): 16-21. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE2018S1003
Authors:CHEN Cun-li  JIA Ya-jun  WANG Jun-fu  ZHAO Jie  ZHANG Yang
Affiliation:1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China;2. Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Loess Mechanics and Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China;3. China Nuclear Power Engineering Co. Ltd., Shenzhen 518124, China
Abstract:The plane strain triaxial tests in which the minor active principal stress (also called σx) keeps invariable are performed on the compacted loess with different water contents. The influences of σx and water content (also called w) on characteristics of the principal stress in plane strain direction (also called σy) during loading are studied. Based on the test results, the expressions describing the bilinear relationships between the principal stress in the plane strain direction and that in other directions are proposed. It is verified whether or not σy can be predicted by the expressions for the intermediate principal stress based on different strength criteria for compacted loess. The test results show that σy is not the intermediate principal stress (also called σ2) but the minor principal stress (also called σ3) during the isotropic consolidation and the initial loading stage. The ratio of the principal stress in the plane strain direction to the minor active principal stress (also called σyx) fast increases after the gentle development stage with the increase of the ratio of the major active principal stress to the minor one (also called R), and the relationships between the principal stresses are respectively linear and nonlinear before and after the turning point. The ratio of the major active principal stress to the minor one at the turning point (also called Rz) is larger than that at the critical point where σy transforms σ2 to σ3 (also called Rc). w and σx have obvious influences on Rz but little ones on Rc. The effects of w and σx on σyx are little as R is small. The relationships between the principal stress parameter (=2σy/(σx+σz), also called K) and R can be describedas two-stage lines. The one is horizontal and K is constant Kc in the first stage. The other one is inclined upward in the second stage. The slope m and Kc are irrelevant to w and σx. The change of σy during the loading can be better predicted by the proposed bilinear function. The predicted results are approximately equal to the test ones only at the failure of soil samples, using the expressions for the intermediate
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《岩土工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《岩土工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号