PLASMA SPRAYED Ti AND HA COATINGS： A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN APS AND VPS

Titanium (Ti) and hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings have been prepared via air (APS) and vacuum plasma spraying (VPS), and then their composition, structure, bonding strength and bioactivity were examined. The results obtained reveal that in APS process many of Ti were oxidized, but in VPS the oxidization was avoided. VPS Ti coating possesses better bonding condition than APS Ti coating. As for HA coating, higher crystallinity has been obtained while the coating was deposited by VPS as compared with APS. The simulated body fluid (SBF) tests show that both of APS and VPS HA coatings possess good bioactivity. As compared with APS, VPS is recommended as a better method to deposit Ti and HA coatings that can be applied as hard tissue replacement implants.

PLASMA SPRAYED Ti AND HA COATINGS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN APS AND VPS

Titanium (Ti) and hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings have been prepared via air (APS) and vacuum plasma spraying (VPS), and then their composition, structure, bonding strength and bioactivity were examined. The results obtained reveal that in APS process many of Ti were oxidized, but in VPS the oxidization was avoided. VPS T i coating possesses better bonding condition than APS Ti coating. As for HA coat ing, higher crystallinity has been obtained while the coating was deposited by V PS as compared with APS. The simulated body fluid (SBF) tests show that both of APS and VPS HA coatings possess good bioactivity. As compared with APS, VPS is r ecommended as a better method to deposit Ti and HA coatings that can be applied as hard tissue replacement implants.