| Abstract: | The results of Oregon's first year with physician-assisted suicide raise two questions. First, how will it be possible to evaluate what is actually going on in Oregon if there is no public access to the records and if physicians are shielded by patient confidentiality rules? The second question is whether the public understood that many, not most, of those who want physician-assisted suicide want it not to relieve suffering as ordinarily understood but to maintain control over their dying, something that may not correlate at all with suffering from illness and disease. This commentary reviews the existing evidence from the Netherlands and suggests that abuse of the vulnerable will likely occur in Oregon over time. It also reviews the insufficiency of the data emerging from Oregon. Finally, it addresses the various issues raised by the other commentators to the main article. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
